|
Committee on
Ways and Means
Subcommittee on Human Resources
For Immediate Release
Contact: Press Office 202-225-8933
April 16, 2002
Columbia Teachers’ College Issues Report
Showing No Negative Impacts and Some Positive Impacts on Children After
Welfare Reform
Even liberal academics cannot find evidence that welfare reform
has had negative impacts on child well-being. On the contrary, they
have found consistently, in the New Lives study released today and in
others, that there are mostly no significant differences and some
positive impacts on child well-being after welfare reform.
The New Lives study shows that employment and earnings have gone
up for families leaving welfare, but that mothers were no less
likely to read to their children, set regular meal times, or be
affectionate.
The New Lives study calls this a failure, because apparently
there was an expectation that two years after moving from welfare to
work, poor parenting behaviors that have been handed down from one
generation to the next would magically disappear. This is hardly a
realistic expectation.
Nearly three million children have left poverty since welfare
reform. That is a huge improvement in children’s lives. Employment
and earnings have increased significantly, and there have been no
negative impacts on child well-being and some positive impacts.
The message of this study and similar studies - that certain
outcomes have not improved in the short time since welfare reform or
have improved only slightly -- is not the same as saying that those
situations have gotten worse. They haven’t. Especially considering
the gloom and doom predicted in 1996 for children’s well-being, this
not much of a story.
Over time, and with changes proposed by the President’s welfare
reauthorization plan that stress promoting child well-being under the
TANF program, we expect more improvements in the future.
BACK to Committee on Ways
and Means |