COMMITTEE on WAYS and MEANS

Chairman Dave Camp

Print this Page Press Releases

Sarah Swinehart (202) 226-4774

Camp, Brady and Boustany Request Answers on ObamaCare Mandate Delay

f t # e
Washington, Jul 23, 2013 | comments
Washington, D.C. – Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dave Camp (R-MI), Health Subcommittee Chairman Kevin Brady (R-TX) and Oversight Subcommittee Chairman Charles Boustany Jr., M.D. (R-LA) sent a letter to U.S. Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew seeking additional information about the decision to delay the employer mandate.  On July 17, the Ways and Means Health Subcommittee held a hearing with a Treasury witness, Mark Iwry, on the employer mandate delay.  At the hearing, Mr. Iwry was unable to answer questions about the process and the analysis that led to the announcement on Treasury’s blog of a one-year delay of the ObamaCare employer mandate reporting requirements and employer mandate tax penalties.

In the letter, the Members request full answers to some of the most basic questions that Treasury's representative was unable to answer by August 5, 2013.
  • When did Treasury personnel begin to consider delaying implementation of the employer reporting requirements and the employer mandate tax penalties (employer provisions) of the Affordable Care Act  (P.L. 111-148 and P.L. 111-152)(ACA)?  In support of this answer identify when discussions involving Treasury personnel began about:
    • Whether the President had the authority to suspend the employer provisions of the ACA; 
    • The effects of suspending of the employer provisions on the operation of the ACA generally;
    • The rationale for or benefits of suspending the employer provisions; and
    • Identify the personnel involved in these discussions.
  • Did the deliberations described in question #1 above consider the affect of suspending the employer provisions on pending lawsuits that challenge the legality of the employer provisions? 
  • Did the deliberations described in question #1 above consider suspending the implementation of the individual mandate provisions of the ACA? 
  • Were IRS personnel informed or consulted about Treasury’s deliberations?  If so, identify the IRS personnel and when they were informed or consulted.  
  • Were other agencies, including but not limited to, the Department of Health and Human Services, informed or consulted about Treasury’s deliberations?  If so, identify the agency personnel and when they were informed or consulted. 
  • When were White House personnel informed or consulted regarding Treasury’s discussions about suspending the employer provisions of the ACA?  Identify who at the White House was informed or consulted. 
  • The July 2, 2013 announcement to suspend the employer provisions of the ACA was made through your Department’s “Treasury Notes Blog,” the same blog that announced far less consequential news, for example, your July 3, 2013 visit to the Denver Mint.  Who at Treasury was involved with the decision to announce this decision in this manner? 
  • Please provide the analysis Treasury officials relied on in making the decision to suspend the employer provision relating to:
    • The impact of the delay on federal spending; 
    • The impact of the delay on federal tax revenues;
    • The impact of the delay on job creation – if so how much?
    • The impact of the delay on number of individuals enrolled in the Exchanges; and 
    • The impact of the delay on number of individuals with employer-sponsored insurance. 

###
f t # e