While the President went to Ohio Monday and repeatedly claimed his trillion-dollar 2009 stimulus plan was “the right thing to do,” it’s hard to tell that from looking at the job situation across the U.S. According to the latest data from the U.S. Department of Labor, and the chart below, through April 2010 a total of 48 out of 50 States had seen net job losses since the President signed the Democrats’ stimulus plan into law in February 2009. The data show that only Alaska, North Dakota and the District of Columbia have seen net job creation since then. And (other than the perhaps predictable exception of D.C.) even those States that have seen some increases in jobs are still well short of the growth the White House originally forecast. What is clear is that 2.7 million more jobs have been eliminated since Democrats’ stimulus, unemployment rose to 9.9 percent instead of falling to 7.4 percent as Democrats predicted, and 15 million Americans – an all-time record for the month of April – are currently unemployed.
To see how the Democrats’ stimulus has failed your state, see the table below.
State |
Administration Projection of Change in Jobs Through December 2010 |
Actual Change in Jobs Through April 2010 |
Alabama |
+52,000 |
-49,600 |
Alaska |
+8,000 |
+2,600 |
Arizona |
+70,000 |
-79,400 |
Arkansas |
+31,000 |
-20,400 |
California |
+396,000 |
-534,900 |
Colorado |
+59,000 |
-89,300 |
Connecticut |
+41,000 |
-38,600 |
Delaware |
+11,000 |
-10,600 |
District of Columbia |
+12,000 |
+8,400 |
Florida |
+206,000 |
-188,100 |
Georgia |
+106,000 |
-125,600 |
Hawaii |
+15,000 |
-10,300 |
Idaho |
+17,000 |
-17,800 |
Illinois |
+148,000 |
-163,100 |
Indiana |
+75,000 |
-37,700 |
Iowa |
+37,000 |
-26,700 |
Kansas |
+33,000 |
-36,800 |
Kentucky |
+48,000 |
-16,800 |
Louisiana |
+50,000 |
-35,000 |
Maine |
+15,000 |
-17,500 |
Maryland |
+66,000 |
-30,400 |
Massachusetts |
+79,000 |
-52,000 |
Michigan |
+109,000 |
-110,600 |
Minnesota |
+66,000 |
-51,300 |
Mississippi |
+30,000 |
-26,900 |
Missouri |
+69,000 |
-49,100 |
Montana |
+11,000 |
-7,300 |
Nebraska |
+23,000 |
-12,300 |
Nevada |
+34,000 |
-66,600 |
New Hampshire |
+16,000 |
-9,000 |
New Jersey |
+100,000 |
-76,600 |
New Mexico |
+22,000 |
-23,900 |
New York |
+215,000 |
-107,600 |
North Carolina |
+105,000 |
-81,600 |
North Dakota |
+8,000 |
+3,500 |
Ohio |
+133,000 |
-138,300 |
Oklahoma |
+40,000 |
-44,700 |
Oregon |
+44,000 |
-49,600 |
Pennsylvania |
+143,000 |
-86,300 |
Rhode Island |
+12,000 |
-18,600 |
South Carolina |
+50,000 |
-26,900 |
South Dakota |
+10,000 |
-5,000 |
Tennessee |
+70,000 |
-66,600 |
Texas |
+269,000 |
-144,800 |
Utah |
+32,000 |
-23,100 |
Vermont |
+8,000 |
-7,200 |
Virginia |
+93,000 |
-46,200 |
Washington |
+75,000 |
-79,500 |
West Virginia |
+20,000 |
-14,300 |
Wisconsin |
+70,000 |
-75,400 |
Wyoming |
+8,000 |
-10,100 |
Source: Administration February 2009 projection and Ways and Means staff calculations based on Department of Labor data.
###