WASHINGTON—Yesterday, 55 conservative foreign policy and national security experts sent an open letter to Speaker John Boehner and members of the House of Representatives expressing their strong support for trade promotion authority, or TPA. In the letter, the experts explain that TPA provides Congress with “strong parameters to constrain what the president negotiates” and “aggressive congressional oversight” in regards to trade agreements, while also creating an opportunity to influence foreign policy decisions otherwise determined by the president.
The experts also explain that better economic relationships with foreign countries result in stronger national security for America, and write that “a defeat of TPA would signal that the United States is not serious about a closer economic relationship with our allies.”
The full text of the letter is available here and below.
The Honorable John A. Boehner
United States House of Representatives
H-232 US Capitol
Washington, DC 20515
Dear Speaker Boehner:
Many conservatives have criticized the Obama administration’s approach to foreign policy and national security over the past six-and-a-half years. They see an attitude that curtails American leadership abroad and leaves the country less secure and prosperous. By contrast, international trade, the subject of our letter today, is one area where the U.S. can be a global leader in both security and prosperity.
Under President Obama, the United States is less trusted by its allies and less feared by its adversaries. This change is evident not only in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, and Iran but in Eastern Europe, Syria, Russia, China, South America, and other countries as well.
While we and many others have strongly disagreed with many of President Obama’s foreign policy and defense decisions, under our Constitution it is the president who ultimately conducts foreign policy. Outside of aggressive oversight, there is often little opportunity for Congress to determine whether the United States retrenches or leads. But one such opportunity is trade.
Soon the House will consider Trade Promotion Authority, which is the necessary step for the conclusion of trade agreements. Having already passed the Senate, this bill will draw attention from around the world. The eyes of our allies, our potential allies, and our adversaries will be focused on your vote.
Washington may be focused on things like the timing of the vote, specific process language in the bill, or even the fate of unrelated policies, but to the rest of the world this vote is simple: Will the United States continue to be a world leader, or will it abdicate and cede this role to other nations? Right or wrong, keen observers across the globe will look at this vote as an indication of whether retrenchment and isolation is limited to the current administration or is shared by the U.S. Congress.
The United States is currently in the midst of negotiations with 11 other countries in the Asia-Pacific region over the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade agreement. These negotiations are essentially on hold pending the outcome of the vote on TPA. It is not an exaggeration to say that should TPA fail to pass, negotiations would falter and fail to conclude successfully, and many of these 11 other countries would look to negotiate with China. In fact, China, at last year’s APEC summit in Beijing, highlighted its preferred trade arrangement, the Free Trade Area of Asia Pacific. Our TPP partners resisted China’s overture; that may not remain the case if we undermine TPP.
The United States is also in the middle of discussions with the European Union over another potential trade agreement. At a time when we are asking our European allies to join us in sanctioning Russia—a major trading partner for many—a defeat of TPA would signal that the United States is not serious about a closer economic relationship with our allies.
It is an historical fact that trade enhances national security. The better our economic relationship with foreign countries, the stronger our national security. But it is impossible to build those new economic relationships without Trade Promotion Authority.
We understand those who argue that we can’t trust the current president with TPA and that we should wait for a new president to take office. But the world isn’t going to hit the pause button while we await a new president. Moreover, the TPA bill before Congress includes strong parameters to constrain what the president negotiates and includes aggressive congressional oversight. On this issue, the United States either engages and leads or it retreats and empowers our adversaries.
For these reasons we strongly urge you to join the Senate and quickly pass Trade Promotion Authority.
|Elliott Abrams||David J. Kramer|
|Michael Allen||Matt Kroenig|
|Stephen Blank||Jeff Kupfer|
|Danielle DiMartino Booth||Philip I. Levy|
|Ian Brzezinski||Michael Lewis|
|Christopher H. Burnham||Mary Beth Long|
|Michael A. Clauser||Clay Lowery|
|Eliot Cohen||Mike Magan|
|Thomas Cynkin||Thomas Mahnken|
|Paula Dobriansky||Paul D. Miller|
|Michael Doran||Stephen Myrow|
|David Dowley||Andrew Natsios|
|Colin Dueck||Meghan O’Sullivan|
|Charles Dunne||Andrew Peek|
|Eric Edelman||J. Peter Pham|
|Dan Fisk||Stephen Rademaker|
|James Edward Fox||Peter Rough|
|Aaron Friedberg||Dan Runde|
|Mark Green||Benjamin Runkle|
|Jeffrey Grieco||Kori Schake|
|John Hannah||David Shedd|
|Matthew Heiman||Kristen Silverberg|
|Brian Hook||Ashley Tellis|
|Karen House||William Tobey|
|Will Inboden||Matthew Vigeant|
|Bob Joseph||Dov S. Zakheim|
|Thomas Karako||Laurence Zuriff|